<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Google to love you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markforrester.co.za/2006/12/07/getting-google-to-love-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markforrester.co.za/2006/12/07/getting-google-to-love-you/</link>
	<description>An independent digital designer dabbling in online entrepreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:05:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.markforrester.co.za/2006/12/07/getting-google-to-love-you/comment-page-1/#comment-17552</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markforrester.co.za/getting-google-to-love-you.htm#comment-17552</guid>
		<description>Hey Gideon,

I do get your point, but I think you have overlooked the heading of this post, &quot;Getting Google to love you&quot;. 

Chris does ramble off the advantages, for the website users, of having a sitemap on your site. Some of which are debatable like you said, but his series of articles are focussed on Site Engine Optimization. Not so much pleasing your readers, but pleasing the search engines, which in turn send more readers your way.

I think pleasing the search engines is something everyone should wants to do. Therefore I would disagree and say this is meant for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gideon,</p>
<p>I do get your point, but I think you have overlooked the heading of this post, &#8220;Getting Google to love you&#8221;. </p>
<p>Chris does ramble off the advantages, for the website users, of having a sitemap on your site. Some of which are debatable like you said, but his series of articles are focussed on Site Engine Optimization. Not so much pleasing your readers, but pleasing the search engines, which in turn send more readers your way.</p>
<p>I think pleasing the search engines is something everyone should wants to do. Therefore I would disagree and say this is meant for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripeak</title>
		<link>http://www.markforrester.co.za/2006/12/07/getting-google-to-love-you/comment-page-1/#comment-17530</link>
		<dc:creator>tripeak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markforrester.co.za/getting-google-to-love-you.htm#comment-17530</guid>
		<description>I read the article and agree (somewhat) - but it&#039;s not meant for everyone. If you have a basic site with easy-to-follow navigation and no &quot;2nd or 3rd tier... you really have no need to supply a sitemap as it will just be a duplication on yr navigation. 

Also with user journeys in mind, as a web designer one needs to cater to various aspects of the human psyche... like curiosity. Site maps are really only for sites which are either very complex or used for business purposes where the user needs to access content in less than two clicks and not get lost in a maze of irrelevant content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article and agree (somewhat) &#8211; but it&#8217;s not meant for everyone. If you have a basic site with easy-to-follow navigation and no &#8220;2nd or 3rd tier&#8230; you really have no need to supply a sitemap as it will just be a duplication on yr navigation. </p>
<p>Also with user journeys in mind, as a web designer one needs to cater to various aspects of the human psyche&#8230; like curiosity. Site maps are really only for sites which are either very complex or used for business purposes where the user needs to access content in less than two clicks and not get lost in a maze of irrelevant content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
